Only not talking body weight here. Just so much going on in the news, the world, I feel the need to comment. So I'm summarizing (hopefully!) instead of doing tons of posts.
New Poster Family for Why Abstinence-Only and No Sex Ed DOES NOT WORK: Sarah Palin's family. Seriously. First her daughter gets pregnant "out of wedlock". Now her son, married for two months, is going to be a father. Only thing, from the picture I saw this morning, his wife looks
well over 2 months pregnant. Soooo.
Bachmann Migraines: I'm kinda split on this. I have sympathy as a migraine sufferer. Yet I know how they can take a person out of the loop for awhile. And even if you are "functioning" you don't always make the best decisions. Especially depending on the kinds of meds you're on! I don't like her anyway because I think she's absolutely nuts. But it does make me wonder, what would disqualify someone form running, for medical reasons? I mean, look at Cheney (VP), FDR. Is it physical or mental? Who decides? The public I guess. But there is so much medical misinformation out there.
Debt Ceiling Crisis: Wish the Republicans would tell the fanatics/tea party faction to take a flying leap. What they want would tank the economy- and increase unemployment. Wish the Democrats would tell the fanatics in their party to take a flying leap. What they want will tank the economy, albeit over a longer period of time.
Gang of 6 Plan: On the surface it sounds good. Compromise from both sides required. We have to tackle SS and Medicare. BUT we have to have tax reform, increase income. Cleaning up corporate - and other - loopholes would be great. Not thrilled with some of the suggestions, like keeping EIC and Child Tax Credit, but eliminating mortgage interest credit. Lowering top tax rates 35% to 29% without seeing an equivalent increase in income at that level from closing loopholes. They gotta go hand in hand, and should actually be
more in my opinion than the reduction. From some reviews I've read on the Economist's website, it seems to me this one will help lower and higher income, and squeeze the middle. Being at the lower middle with no kids, no investments (capital gains, what's that?), and only mortgage interest deduction, this would increase my taxes.
Cut, Cap, & Balance: No dice. Really think this idea would hurt the economy quickly, put us back into recession, distract from what needs to be done, and not help in the long run. Hate the constitutional ammendment. Why do we need an amendment to tell us what we already know we have to do? It would also eliminate the government's ability to respond in economic downturns, emergencies (Katrina, anyone?), and so on. I really think the government should have that flexibility. Not to mention the wasted time and money when it won't get out of Congress and if by some miracle it does, it is facing almost certain veto. Why kick a dead horse? We also have got to raise revenues. Capping spending to such a low percentage of GDP when faced with an increasing burden in SS/Medicare, well, how's that supposed to work? Oh, that's right. No more ss, medicare, food stamps. If you're poor, you just don't work hard enough is what the right seems to say/feel. At least, that's how it comes across to me!
overview of debt ceiling plans
Taxes/No Taxes: No ifs, ands or buts about it we have got to have more revenue. Cutting spending alone isn't going to be enough. Especially if they cut willy-nilly and abruptly. Although I think increases in taxes (whether by closing loopholes, allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire, or adding new taxes) they should be phased in from the top down over several years to avoid great shock to the economy, and to avoid harming the poorest among us. I also think we desperately need tax reform. Refunds should be limited to how much you have paid in. If you paid X amount, that's the most you can get back. No getting back more than that. Then some of that savings can be used to shore up
effective programs like food stamps (which are pathetic in the amount you can get, and actually have a better positive economic effect than many programs) and child health care programs. Which would hopefully help those on the bottom rung of the ladder that would be hurt by the refund cap.
Women are 51% of Population, 16.6% of Congress: What is up with that? I'm sorry, but men, be they white or black, don't truly represent me or my life. They can try, and some may do well. But I truly think men and women think and react differently. Having more of my view/perspective as a woman in Congress would be more beneficial to me! Read an
interesting opinion piece yesterday(don't like the headline, but some of the discussion is thought-provoking).
Casey Anthony: Get over it people. She was found not-guilty of the murder so cut it out. Move on. GET A LIFE. And when is Nancy Grace going to get the pants sued off of her? Some of what she says seems like libel or slander to me. Wonder what the legal definition is? I truly wish CNN (and other news networks!) would stop pandering to this woman and having her on.
Murdoch & the Hacking Scandal: Well, duh. People are suprised at this? What the heck did they think was gonna happen with increasing monopolies in the media, and increasing partisanship, and increasing sensationalistic reporting. Just, duh! I think something needs to be done to break up these monopolies, and to require news to be fact-based, with no opinion or asides. Don't interpret, just report!!!! Anything that is opinion and interpretation needs to have a warning label, and something on the screen stating THIS IS JUST OUR OPINION/INTERPRETATION. PLEASE THINK FOR YOURSELF.
There's more rumbling around in my head, but that's all I can get out for now. :)